Archive - Feb 2, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

Can Obama close the red-blue gap? Can anyone?

Featured Topic | Posted 41 weeks 3 days ago

Is it possible to detoxify the discourse in 2008?

Sometimes simplest of arguments can reveal the deepest of divisions. Take the dispute between Senator Barack Obama and the Clintons over the legacy of Ronald Reagan. The Clintons pounced on Obama for presenting the icon of the red team in a positive light. “You’re not even allowed to say a Republican had an idea,” Obama lamented.

It all might have sounded like a parody of our constricted political discourse had the controversy not been so revealing of the obvious split in both parties on the eve of the largest day of delegate selection ever.

Call it a split between whether politics should be a pursuit of consensus or an effort to enact a party’s fundamental ideas, its core orthodoxy. Each party’s nominating fight boiled down last week to a choice between two candidates: one who argues for a politics that reaches across party lines and looks to identify common ground within the broader electorate; and one who states his or her first principle as representing the traditional party base by drawing firm ideological lines.

Where can Red and Blue America find political consensus? Which candidate is best equipped to bridge that divide?

Read More

Ben likes: Why Republicans like Obama

Peter Wehner/Washington Post

One reason for Obama's GOP appeal is that unlike Clinton and especially John Edwards, Obama has a message that, at its core, is about unity and hope rather than division and resentment. He stresses that "out of many we are one." And to his credit, Barack Obama is running a color-blind campaign. But the one thing that will keep Obama's appeal from translating into widespread support among Republicans is that he is, on almost every issue, a conventional liberal.

Yet Obama is among the most impressive political talents of our lifetime. If he defeats Hillary Clinton, the question for the general election is not whether he can transcend his race but whether he can reach beyond his ideology.

Read More

Joel likes: Lowering the volume

Bob Herbert/New York Times

There is something thrilling about the current election season. Because of the Internet and other technological wonders, the public space has been radically expanded. Audiences at the debates and the various campaign rallies of both parties are paying extremely close attention. Young people are coming into the process in droves.

For all its flaws, the system forged in the 18th century is working remarkably well in the 21st. James Madison may never have heard of CNN or Google, but the people who walked through a cold rain to vote in South Carolina, and those who trudged through the snow in Iowa and New Hampshire, and the millions who will vote on Super Tuesday can still hear him:

“If there be a principle that ought not to be questioned within the United States, it is that every man has a right to abolish an old government and establish a new one.”

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

We know about "warrantless wiretapping" because of James Risen's reporting.

Featured Topic | Posted 41 weeks 3 days ago

Will a New York Times reporter go to jail over his spying stories?

James Risen was one-half the New York Times reporting team that won a Pulitzer Prize for revealing the existence of the "warrantless wiretapping" program. Now a grand jury has subpoenaed him, seeking the confidential sources that were the basis of his reporting on that story and others in his book, "State of War." Risen has said he will protect his sources -- and he might go to jail to do so.

Why is the government going after Risen's sources now? What does this action mean for wartime reporting?

Read More

Ben likes: Has the New York Times violated the Espionage Act?

Gabriel Schoenfeld/Commentary

What the New York Times has done is nothing less than to compromise the centerpiece of our defensive efforts in the war on terrorism. If information about the NSA program had been quietly conveyed to an al-Qaeda operative on a microdot, or on paper with invisible ink, there can be no doubt that the episode would have been treated by the government as a cut-and-dried case of espionage. Publishing it for the world to read, the Times has accomplished the same end while at the same time congratulating itself for bravely defending the First Amendment and thereby protecting us—from, presumably, ourselves.

Read More

Joel likes: Is Mukasey prioritizing the harassment of journalists?

Glenn Greenwald/Salon

It's hard to overstate how threatening this behavior is. The Bush administration has erected an unprecedented wall of secrecy around everything it does. Beyond illegal spying, if one looks at the instances where we learned of lawbreaking and other forms of lawless radicalism -- CIA black sites, rendition programs, torture, Abu Ghraib, pre-war distortion of intelligence, destruction of CIA torture videos -- it is, in every case, the by-product of two forces: government whistleblowers and reporters willing to expose it.

Grand Jury Subpoenas such as the one issued to Risen have as their principal purpose shutting off that avenue of learning about government wrongdoing -- the sole remaining avenue for a country plagued by a supine, slothful, vapid press and an indescribably submissive Congress.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

A beacon abroad?

Featured Topic | Posted 41 weeks 3 days ago

Is the election helping America's image abroad?

After 9/11, a French newspaper famously declared that "we're all Americans now." But that warm feeling quickly dissipated. Now it's on the rise again, as citizens in countries around the world follow the 2008 election campaign as closely as they would races in their own country.

Can America restore its standing in the world? And what does the campaign have to do with it?

Read More

Ben likes: The American friend and enemy

Jose Vilas Nogueira/Libertad (via Worldmeets.us)

International progressives get scandalized if the United States intervenes in defense of liberty (their own, but also ours)outside their borders, but become sick with fear if the United States turns to isolation. They don't want the "enemy" to abandon them and yet they cling to him with desperation as a "friend."

Read More

Joel likes: How the 2008 campaign made the world love America again

James Forsyth/Foreign Policy

The 2008 campaign has reminded the public overseas, and especially in allied countries, of the diversity and vibrancy of American democracy. It is hard for even the most hardened anti-American not to be impressed by the fact that the Democrats will nominate either an African-American or a women as their candidate, while watching this twisting and turning campaign play out gives the lie to the view that United States is some kind of corporate oligarchy.

Another piece of good news is that all three candidates with a realistic chance of being the next president play well abroad in a way that George W. Bush does not. Indeed, with a more pro-American leadership in Europe and the sting being drawn from Iraq by the success of the surge, the next president will have a real window of opportunity to chalk up some quick wins in 2009. The rest of the democratic world will be keen to show America that cooperating is worth its while.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

It could be worse. But how much worse?

Featured Topic | Posted 41 weeks 4 days ago

With a "troubling" jobs report, is recession around the corner?

American employers cut 17,000 jobs last month -- the first such reduction in four years. President Bush called Friday's labor report "troubling," and it's tough to disagree. The loss of jobs is another indicator of a slowing economy. But policymakers and economists question whether the Bush stimulus is enough to avert a recession.

What should the government do, if anything, to spur the economy? Is America entering another recession, or something not quite as painful?

Read More

Ben likes: Recession? Not yet

Investor's Business Daily

Congress' Joint Economic Committee recently created an Employment Recession Probability Index that uses changes in jobless claims and the unemployment rate. It has predicted every recession since World War II. What's it show today? Believe it or not, the likelihood the U.S. was in recession in January was 6% -- down from 35.5% in December.

So, yes, we've hit a slow patch. But no, despite the bleatings of a media establishment eager for "change" in Washington, we're not in a recession yet.

Read More

Joel likes: The insignificance of zero

Paul Krugman/New York Times

So the new labor report is out, and it says that nonfarm payrolls actually fell last month. On the other hand, employment growth for December was revised up.

You shouldn’t take any of this seriously. A better guide is probably to average the last 2 or 3 months. What you get then is that employment is still growing, but v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y. In particular, employment growth is well short of what’s necessary to keep up with population growth. So even though it’s premature to say that jobs are shrinking, as a practical matter this makes no difference: the truth is that the jobs picture looks moderately dire.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote