Archive - Feb 10, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
Chelsea Clinton
The Associated Press

The Clinton campaign didn't like David Shuster's comments about Chelsea.

Featured Topic | Posted 47 weeks 3 days ago

The 'pimp' comment: Is MSNBC sexist?

MSNBC correspondent David Shuster has been suspended for suggesting the Clinton campaign had "pimped out" Chelsea Clinton on the campaign trail. The suspension follows by a few weeks the Chris Matthews apology for his comments about Hillary Clinton's political campaign -- and activists are starting to suggest there's a pattern of sexism at MSNBC.

Read More

Ben likes: It's hard out there for a Clinton

James Poulos/The American Scene

In a world where pimping out your ride is a great honor, ‘sort of’ pimping out your daughter would appear to be less of an honor primarily on account of the ‘sort of’ qualifier. Of course, Shuster was trying to be less-than-honorable, obeying another cardinal rule of MSM Edginess: degrade obliquely.

But he was under marching orders — probably not written in neat hand by an MSNBC intern, but certainly uploaded into his hard drive over many years spent in moving through a high-budget industry devoted largely to making itself comfortable with the great American lowbrow.

Read More

Joel likes: Missing the forest for the tree

Andrew Golis/Talking Points Memo

Put in the context of his un-punished colleagues, I find Shuster's suspension deeply absurd. Shuster, for anyone who missed the hubub yesterday, said that Hillary Clinton was "pimping out" her daughter Chelsea because Chelsea is campaigning for her. Stupid on the merits and an obviously gross and sexist metaphor. But worse than the persistent misogyny that comes from Joe Scarborough, Chris Matthews, and Tucker Carlson? Worse than, hour after hour and day after day, laying out a sexist worldview that might actually persuade viewers?

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Barack Obama Hillary Clinton
The Associated Press

Some good wins, but a shadow still lingers.

Featured Topic | Posted 47 weeks 3 days ago

Does Obama have momentum?

It wasn't "Super Tuesday" -- call it "Significant Saturday." Barack Obama won all the states in play: Louisiana, Nebraska and Washington, and he did so by sizable margins.

Read More

Ben likes:Obama sweeps Saturday

Ed Morrisey/Captain's Quarters

Barack Obama swept the trio of contests in the Democratic primaries yesterday, increasing his momentum and narrowing the delegate gap even further. The Clinton campaign tried to shrug off the losses as "expected", but with the Beltway contests of DC, Virginia, and Maryland coming on Tuesday, Hillary may not see another win for a while.

This gives Obama the lead before the superdelegates are considered, 908-877. Hillary has a 90-vote lead among the superdelegates, and it has become clear that the superdelegates will have to make the difference if the nomination is to be settled before the convention. This has already generated some anger and threats.

Read More

Joel likes: Obama landslides could break deadlock

Ben Smith/Politico

Barack Obama’s landslide victories in three mid-sized states Saturday suggest that he has the opportunity build a significant lead over Hillary Rodham Clinton among the locked-in “pledged” delegates before the candidates face off in the big battlegrounds of Ohio and Texas on March 4.

The results in Washington and Nebraska vindicated Obama’s strategy of preparing expensive efforts to organize votes after the Feb. 5 contests that many expected – wrongly — effectively to decide the race.

In squeezing every delegate out of the small and mid-sized states between now and March 4, and every dollar out of his supporters, Obama is hoping to build a head of steam this month that will make him unstoppable and will lure free-floating superdelegates to his camp.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
biofuel
Photo by Flickr user gomud13 under a Creative Commons license.

Is there anything good for the environment you can put in there?

Featured Topic | Posted 47 weeks 4 days ago

Are biofuels actually worse for the environment?

Turns out biofuels might not be so environmentally friendly, after all: The methods used to grow the crops end up adding significant greenhouse gases to the environment. But that doesn't lessen the need, advocates say, to search for replacements for oil.

Is there a better way to create ethanol? How can alternative fuels be produced without harming the environment?

Read More

Ben likes:Energetic economics

Clifford D. May/National Review

Right now, most American ethanol is made from corn but it can be made from just about any starchy crop: sugar cane (already widely used in Brazil), yams, and sweet potatoes, to name a few. And any kind of biomass, including wild grasses, crop residues, fallen leaves and weeds that clog rivers can be used to make methanol, as can urban trash and coal - two commodities the U.S. possesses in abundance.

That would be just the start: Americans are innovators and they would come up with a wealth of new ideas. Like what? How about funneling unwanted carbon dioxide into reservoirs covered with algae that would feed on the carbon dioxide (as all plants do), then turning the algae into alcohol fuel? Is that feasible? That’s what entrepreneurs get paid the big bucks to figure out.

Read More

Joel likes:Develop good biofuels

Kit Batten, Jake Caldwell/Center for American Progress

Biofuels and other types of bio-based energy will not solve all of the world's energy challenges. We also need an array of energy sources from the sun, wind, and other renewable technologies. Nonetheless, with the right standards, biofuels can play a direct role in diversifying our energy sources and contributing to economic growth and development, particularly in rural communities in the United States and the rest of the developed and developing world.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google