Archive - Jan 18, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

The next Gipper?

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago

Obama lays claim to Reagan's mantle

Barack Obama thinks his potential presidency has the potential to be as transformational as Ronald Reagan's. There's only one problem: He's running for the Democratic nomination, and voters there disdain the comparisons to a hero of the conservative movement.

Is Obama Reaganesque? Will the comparison hurt him?

Read More

Ben likes: The crucial Democratic Reagan primary

Daniel Larison/The American Scene

I have generally dismissed or viewed very skeptically claims for Barack Obama’s “transformational” potential, whether in foreign affairs or domestic politics. These theories attribute too much importance to symbolism and vague rhetoric, and they take Obama’s views too little into account.

However, I might be willing to see how Obama represents the possibility of the Democrats’ reconciling themselves to Reagan and the Reagan-Bush years, in part because there may be good reason to think that the political era that began in 1980 is coming to a close.

Read More

Joel likes: Has Obama lost his mind over Reagan?

Matthew Rothschild/The Progressive

For Obama to now laud Reagan for restoring “entrepreneurship,” the very buzzword you hear right before the sting of deregulation, is either shockingly naïve or reactionary—or it betrays a willingness of Obama to find common ground in ideological quicksand.

Reagan, like Bush, did everything he could to gut federal agencies, from the Progressive Era to the New Deal through the 1970s, that served as a check on corporate power. Talk about no “accountability.”

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Barack Obama tries to close the deal in Las Vegas.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago

Nevada caucuses: Democrats seek electoral gold in the Silver State

The top Democratic candidates are waging a pitched battle in Nevada, which holds its caucuses on Saturday. Traditionally, the Nevada caucuses haven't received much attention. But this isn't a traditional year. With Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama entering tomorrow's contest with one win apiece in contested states, Nevada has suddenly become a kind of tiebreaker. The campaign has revolved around issues of race, unions and even nuclear waste.

But how will Nevada's caucuses shape the nominating process? Could the desert state caucus shake up the contest yet again?

Read More

Ben likes: Bill and Hillary, union-busters?

Ronald Cass/RCP

Few people bother to challenge Bill and Hillary's reversals and revisions -- like backing a lawsuit challenging the location of caucus sites in Las Vegas that their team helped pick when they thought the Culinary Workers Union would endorse Hillary. But maybe this one time we should take Bill and Hillary at their word. Let's show that new bipartisan spirit. Take up their cause. Roll back rules that support union politicking. Let workers spend their own money and pick their own candidates. And see how Democrats really like union members exercising their independence.

Read More

Joel likes: The post-ironic campaign

Terence Samuel/The American Prospect

Regardless of the results in Nevada this weekend, neither the Clinton nor Obama camps will feel the need to make any significant strategic adjustments, and neither will be any closer to dropping out. Even John Edwards seems to be settling in for the long haul, maybe with an eye toward keeping his voters from going to Hillary. No state is crucial anymore, and any single loss can be explained away. It is conceivable that it could take until Pennsylvania before this thing is settled: We might be playing baseball before we know who has the Democratic nomination.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Department of Energy

An atomic bomb test, 1945.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago

No nukes? Former national security officials say they're no longer needed

Even as nuclear nightmares rise anew -- with the fear that terrorists might get their hands on a bomb -- a growing number of former U.S. officials are calling for an end to the Atomic Era. Henry Kissinger, George Schulz, William Perry and Sam Nunn are among the national security experts who say it's time to get rid of the bombs.

"The risks from continuing to go down the mountain or standing pat are too real to ignore," they wrote this week in the Wall Street Journal.

What are the challenges in going nuclear-free? Will it make us more or less safe?

Read More

Ben likes: The Fab Four speak

Gordon Chang/Contentions

There is no consensus in the West as to the nature of present nuclear threats or the means to deal with them. All this means that we cannot risk everything on the assumption that yesterday’s concepts of deterrence apply to today’s situation. This argument is the intellectual foundation for the disarmament proposalmade by Messrs. Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, and Nunn. Yet it is also the best reason for the use of force. North Korea and Iran are nations led by hard men who might not be amenable to Western notions of persuasion or reason and may, in some circumstances, be unafraid of the prospect of massive death.

Read More

Joel likes: The Eliminators

Joseph Cirincione and Alexandra Bell/Center for American Progress

Every one of these officials favored building and deploying thousands of nuclear weapons while in office. But they say today’s global situation has radically changed. There is no longer a military justification for the almost 10,000 nuclear weapons that the United States fields and the estimated 15,000 held by Russia, many of them on hair-trigger alert ready to launch within 15 minutes. Together these two powers hold 95 percent of all the world’s nuclear weapons, with the other seven nuclear weapon states dividing up the remaining 1,000.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Talking stimulus in the White House on Friday.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago

Stimulating offer? Bush suggests $800 for every taxpayer, $1,600 for families

A check from the U.S. government may be in the mail soon. In an effort to stimulate the wobbly economy, President Bush today announced a $140 billion economic stimulus package. The big idea floating around the White House is tax rebates worth $800 for individuals and $1,600 for families.

Bush said that a fiscal stimulus would "provide a shot in the arm to keep a fundamentally strong economy healthy." But some economists say that temporary spending increases and one-shot tax rebates do not always have the intended effect.

Does a rebate check sound appealing? Or would more permanent tax cuts be a better boost for the U.S. economy?

Read More

Ben likes: No stimulus gimmicks, please

Bill Thomas & Alex Brill/The Wall Street Journal

Perhaps the easiest "stimulus" package Washington could to enact would be to drop money from planes into the hands of voters/consumers. However, the economic evidence from the 2001 experience suggests this is an ineffective tool. University of Michigan economists found that most rebates were saved, not spent. While this result may be a disappointment to those of us who thought this approach would be effective, Congress must be willing to learn from past legislative experience. Popular versus effective is sometimes the difference between politics and economics.

Read More

Joel likes: A chicken in every pot

Kevin Depew/Minyanville

We saw a summary on Bloomberg noting that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on the "Today" show the administration is focusing on consumers. "A big part of the program should be focused on consumers, individuals, families, getting money to them because they will spend it,'' Paulson said on the show.
No, they won't spend it. That's the key. That's the disconnect. As the Congressional Budget Office in their review of potential fiscal stimulus responses noted, "a household’s propensity to consume appears to vary with its income and depends on expectations of the household of what will happen to that income over the longer term."

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Egyptians dressed as prisoners of the US Guantanamo Bay prison protest Wednesday.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago

Canada puts U.S. on torture list

BBC

Canada thinks the U.S. has gone too far in the war on terrorism. The U.S. is listed in a Canadian diplomatic manual as a country where prisoners are at risk of being tortured. Canadian officials say the document doesn't reflect official policy -- but the damage has been done.

Why would Canadians make the statement? And how much attention should the U.S. pay to its allies on questions of national security?

Read More

Ben likes: A Canadian Course in Torture

Abe Greenwald/Commentary's Contentions

A course on torture awareness sounds like something from the 07′/08′ Columbia University course catalogue. According to this course, interrogation techniques such as “forced nudity, isolation, and sleep deprivation” are considered torture. Then again this is the country that considers critical media commentary a violation of human rights.

Guantanamo Bay (where prisoners tend to gain weight) is specifically mentioned. It should be noted that suspects held at Gitmo live in conditions far superior to the those of the men and women on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces.

Read More

Joel likes: Innocent victim of U.S. torture policy

Ruth Coniff/The Progressive

If ever there were a case that should turn the public against the Bush Administration's push for broader powers to suspend due process and continue to torture terror suspects, it is the story of Maher Arar, a Canadian computer engineer who found himself caught up in post-9-11 law enforcement paranoia. Arar was a victim of the secret "rendition" program --a process by which terrorism suspects have been "disappeared" to other countries notorious for torturing prisoners during interrogation.

The Canadian government blames the United States for withholding information from Canadian authorities, and sending Arar to Syria without notifying his family or the Canadian consulate, and for ignoring Arar's objections that he would be tortured. And, of course, there is the matter of his innocence.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

A striking writer gets to the nub of the matter.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Hollywood drama: Directors make a deal -- will the writers follow?

As the walkout by the Writers Guild of America drags on, the directors guild managed to settle on a new contract with the studios which includes payment for programming that streams on the Internet. Without scripts, of course, the directors have nothing to do. But Thursday's deal could be a good sign: The studios and the unions have long engaged in what's known in the biz as "pattern bargaining." The deal struck with one union sets a pattern for how the other unions will get paid.

Meantime, out-of-work writers are finding other creative -- and potentially lucrative -- outlets online. Which raises the question: Who needs Hollywood, anyway?

Read More

Ben likes: Apocalypse now

Roger L. Simon/Pajamas Media

New media is poised to destroy the entertainment industry, as we know it.

People as diverse as television writer Rob Long and Internet guru Marc Andreesen are talking about the end of Hollywood -- and they have a point. Several, in fact. Netscape’s Andreesen wrote extensively on his blog in November about how Hollywood -- or more specifically movie and television writers, directors and producers -- should emulate Silicon Valley and become entrepreneurial. And that this inevitable revolution has only been hastened by the writers’ walkout. Indeed, there is some anecdotal evidence that this is already happening.

Read More

Joel likes: A modest suggestion to end the writers' strike

Miles Mogelescu/Huffington Post

Here's the dirty little secret: No one knows how big or small a market the distribution of films and television programs over the internet will be in coming years -- not the writers, not the directors, and not the studios. And that's the nub of the problem. Hollywood runs on fear and both the guilds and the studios fear they will make a mistake in projecting the value of the internet market and that mistake will be locked in for many years to come.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google