Archive - Jan 17, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

You may feel a slight pressure...

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Scientists clone a human embryo: Brave new world or false hope?

Biologists claim to have made yet another breakthrough in the technically challenging, ethically fraught realm of genetic research and cloning. Scientists working in La Jolla, Calif., and Detroit say they created cloned human embryos using cells from adult men.

In principle, replacement tissues grown from those cells would be genetically identical to the men they came from. So they could, in principle, be used to fix failing organs, without any fear of rejection.

The problem is that the principle and the practice are still far apart. But if the cloned cells work in practice, these scientists have added a new dimension to the debate over embryonic stem-cell research.

Read More

Ben likes: Now they tell us…

Ryan T. Anderson/On the Square

A few weeks ago we all heard the announcement of a major scientific breakthrough that allowed scientists to create the equivalent of human embryonic stem cells (called induced pluripotent stem cells) but without using or destroying embryos. In the aftermath of this news, we’ve been hearing surprising things from the scientists. They now acknowledge that there really are moral concerns in embryo-destructive research, and that they’ve been concerned about this all along. Maybe someone should let the New York Times editorial page editors know.

Read More

Joel likes: What does it mean?

Arthur Caplan/MSNBC

The cloning of human embryos has now been accomplished. Is it a viable strategy for creating stem cells to cure diseases? A lot more research will have to be done to find out. While we wait, let's not be frightened by scare tactics into not funding research that may be the key to curing what is currently incurable.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

This is becoming a common sight across the country.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

The economy falters: How can it get strong again?

The economy is weak. Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, admitted as much on Thursday -- and suggested that a quick stimulus is needed. Democrats and Republicans have put their heads together in Washington D.C. to figure out how to light a fire under the economy: Tax cuts, rebates, unemployment insurance and more are being considered.

What can be done to rescue the economy? How deep will the problems go?

Read More

Ben likes: Relief that works

Investor's Business Daily

Though it isn't clear the U.S. economy is in a recession, everyone's talking stimulus. How big? How much? Good questions. How about sticking with what really works?

How soon we forget. Just seven years ago, President Bush took office as a recessionary hangover from the Clinton years took hold. It became job one for Bush to end it as quickly as possible. In 2001, just as they are today, Democrats were playing the "two Americas" card and clamoring for "stimulus." And Bush pretty much agreed to the same thing Congress is talking about doing now: Give some small tax breaks, extend jobless benefits and add a $600 rebate. But it didn't really stimulate much.

Read More

Joel likes: A revival of 1992's glum mood

David Leonhardt/New York Times

This year, it’s still possible that the country will avoid a full-blown recession.

The main problem now is that the good times are no longer good enough to carry the middle class through the bad times. For much of the last 35 years, the incomes of most workers have been growing far more slowly than they once did. In the current expansion, which started in 2001, the median weekly paycheck of workers has actually fallen 1 percent, once inflation is taken into account, according to the Labor Department.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is doing his part to keep the war of words going.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

America and Iran: At the precipice of war?

There's still a chance that the U.S. and Iran could go to war. President Bush -- unconvinced that Iran has abandoned its nuclear ambitions -- kept up his tough rhetoric during his trip to the Middle East, and Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been responding in kind. Iran's neighbors are watching nervously.

What would trigger a war with Iran? What could avert conflict?

Read More

Ben likes: Why the Case for Military Action Still Stands

Norman Podhoretz/Commentary

Bush is right about the resemblance between 2008 and 1938. In 1938, as Winston Churchill later said, Hitler could still have been stopped at a relatively low price and many millions of lives could have been saved if England and France had not deceived themselves about the realities of their situation. Mutatis mutandis, it is the same in 2008, when Iran can still be stopped from getting the bomb and even more millions of lives can be saved—but only provided that we summon up the courage to see what is staring us in the face and then act on what we see.

Read More

Joel likes: Norman Podhoretz's assumptions

Andrew Sullivan

I don't think that Iran's regime should be under-estimated. It is a highly religious, fundamentalist and dangerously fractured entity. But it seems much more likely that it would use nuclear weapons as leverage to extend its power in the region and world, to counter-balance Israel and the Sunni powers and to enhance its influence than that it would start an apocalyptic battle which it would lose.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Friendships are fraying on the battlefield.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Why can't NATO and the U.S. get along in Afghanistan?

U.S. commanders don't think their NATO allies are fighting smart enough in Afghanistan. The NATO countries are insulted, and wonder why they're fighting America's war. And in the meantime, Taliban forces that once seemed defeated are growing in strength.

Why is the U.S. fighting with its NATO allies? And what can be done to salvage the mission in Afghanistan?

Read More

Ben likes: Out with old, in with a new NATO

Investor's Business Daily

The old NATO, built on protecting Europe from a conventional attack by Warsaw Pact forces massed in Eastern Europe, is dead. We need a new NATO that's both flexible and capable of sending troops quickly to hot spots to fight unconventional wars.

Read More

Joel likes: The NATO Divide

Spencer P. Boyer & Caroline P. Wadhams/Center for American Progress

There are no easy answers, but the United States can do more to demonstrate to the world that Afghanistan is a priority and help change public opinion in Europe. U.S. officials must move away from statements such as those of Admiral Mike Mullen in his recent Congressional testimony: "In Afghanistan, we do what we can. In Iraq, we do what we must." This only shows NATO populations in Europe and Canada that we are not serious about the mission, and makes them more dubious of the whole enterprise.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Drivers pay, the oil companies profit. Got a problem with that?

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Profit backlash? Oil companies to report earnings this week

Historic oil prices and $3-a-gallon gasoline have been contributing to fears of a recession, but they've yet to cause the hue and cry that some might expect. Americans may simply be growing more accustomed to high fuel costs, analysts say.

All that may change beginning Friday, when oilfield services giant Schlumberger Ltd. kicks off earnings season for the oil sector. Companies may not post record profits, but certainly may report big enough earnings to raise some eyebrows. Given the weakening economy and prospects for $4-a-gallon gasoline, hefty oil profits are almost sure to renew debate over whether Big Oil is profiting at the expense of most Americans.

Read More

Ben likes: Why price-gouging doesn't exist

Iain Murray/Competitive Enterprise Institute

The situation after hurricanes Katrina and Rita provides perhaps the best test case for whether price gouging actually occurs. The nation’s energy infrastructure took a severe blow. If ever there was a situation ripe for exploitation by the unscrupulous, it was then. Congress asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the market for evidence of gouging. The FTC report found no evidence to suggest that refiners manipulated prices through any means.

Read More

Joel likes: Well, well

Michael Kinsley/Slate

Ordinarily, we shouldn't want the government to decide when profits become "excess." But the case of huge profits from the run-up in oil prices is different for two reasons. First, it is unusually clear that these profits have nothing to do with productivity. Diverting them to the U.S. Treasury would have no effect on the incentive to extract more oil from American ground. Second, some or all of these profits are directly related to a situation that is imposing huge sacrifices—financial and otherwise—from others; that is, the Iraq war.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
CNN Photo

Warrior for the middle class?

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Lou Dobbs for president?

Remember when politicians used to be politicians?

Now a movie star is the governor of California. A professional wrestler was governor of Minnesota. A TV actor was briefly considered to be a leading contender for the GOP presidential nomination.

And now ... Lou Dobbs?

The TV anchor, well known for his tart takes on illegal immigration and free trade issues, is the focus of a "Draft Dobbs" Web site. He's saying he doesn't plan to run, but he's not closing the door entirely.

Could a Dobbs candidacy affect the presidential race?

Read More

Ben likes: The apocalyptic centrism of Lou Dobbs

Rich Lowry/National Review

With Lou Dobbs, the longer you listen, the more self-discrediting he becomes. His trick is to spout clichés drawn from the right and the left — any one of which has a 50/50 chance that the average person will agree with it — and give them a patina of freshness by wrapping them in angry and dire rhetoric. That rhetoric is their essential glue, making Dobbs the country’s foremost practitioner of apocalyptic centrism.

Read More

Joel likes: What to really do about immigration

Jeff Faux/The American Prospect

Sooner or later, the U.S. will have to include Mexico in any serious effort to control illegal immigration. By starting this conversation now, the Democrats can wrest the initiative out of the hands of the right wing and build a consensus for a policy prescription that fits the geography of the problem. The alternative is to let the resentment fester and hope that the Republicans will keep their attack dogs leashed. Fat chance.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

The sign speaks for itself.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Legal and rarer: Abortions hit a 30-year low

Back in the 1990s, Bill Clinton famously talked about making abortion "safe, legal and rare." Partisans on both sides of the issue refuted that formulation.

But the last part, at least, is becoming more of a reality. A new study says says the abortion rate fell 9 percent between 2000 and 2005, probably due to a combination of better access to contraception and less access to abortion providers. Eighty-seven percent of U.S. counties have no abortion provider, the study said.

How does this news affect the abortion debate?

Read More

Ben likes: Abortion restrictions reduce abortion

Jeremy Pierce/Parableman

It's unclear if laws restricting abortion cause a drop in abortions or an underlying factor explains the drop in abortions and the election of those who would pass such restrictions. In this case that underlying factor might be a value change in the populace. But it turns out that, even taking into account value change, there is enough of a decrease in the number of abortions to justify thinking that abortion restrictions
do reduce the number of abortions.

Read More

Joel likes: The confusing parsing of abortion numbers

Shamanic/The Newshoggers

In my imaginary perfect world, abortion would be (to borrow a phrase) safe, legal, and rare. 1.2 million still seems like too high a number, but I recall data earlier in the decade that showed a bump in abortions during the 2000-2001 recession and afterwards. In nearly every way, the new information is good news. Right up until the last sentence: "Nevertheless, 87 percent of U.S. counties, accounting for 35 percent of women ages 15 to 44, do not have an abortion provider, the report found." 87% of counties? That number is way too high too. I suppose if you're highly resolved on this issue, this post seems contradictory. I want more access for more women and a reduction in the overall rate of abortion.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

President Bush meets with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

Featured Topic | Posted 50 weeks 6 days ago

Bush's Middle East trip: What did it accomplish?

The White House -- publicly, at least -- said it found Mideast leaders receptive to its promotion of democracy in sessions that Bush held on his trip, from Israel and the West Bank to the Persian Gulf to his final stop in Egypt.

Yet, when pressed about this, the leaders of some U.S.-allied Arab nations along the president's path have employed the most diplomatic terms possible to change the subject.

After eight days and stops in six nations, what does President Bush have to show for his effort at diplomacy?

Read More

Ben likes: Don't write off Bush's Middle East trip

Georgie Anne Geyer

It would be easy to point to President Bush's just-completed trip to the Middle East and sum it up with our usual smart journalistic jeers.

After all, by the time he left for Israel, the Palestinian territories, Kuwait and points south, the administration had not even bothered to name working groups for the "peace process" kicked off so ostentatiously last fall in Annapolis. Monitoring mechanisms were not in place. But in some respects, this trip, admittedly so little and so late, represented some small but important moves forward.

Read More

Joel likes: Those ungrateful Saudis

Robert Scheer/The Nation

It turns out they hate us not for our success, as Bush once claimed, but for our incompetence, which he has done much to exhibit. The problem is that few believe that Bush is the least bit serious about addressing any of the region's problems. As an editorial in the Arab News, a Saudi English-language newspaper, put it on the occasion of Bush's visit: " ... no Palestinian, no Arab believes, he will, or can, deliver.... Everything he touches turns to dust and ashes. Iraq, Afghanistan, maybe now even Iran."

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Will the Navy put the whales at risk?

Featured Topic | Posted 51 weeks 2 hours ago

Bush overrules whales, says Navy can use sonar

It wasn't a fluke decision.

President Bush on Wednesday issued a memorandum allowing the Navy to conduct sonar tests off the coast of California -- potentially endangering sonar-sensitive whales. In so doing, Bush set aside a judge's ruling that the testing violated federal environmental protection laws.

Why does the Navy need to do such testing? And what will happen to the whales?

Read More

Ben likes: Whales before men

Investor's Business Daily

Whale ho! Pay no attention to the Chinese submarine behind it. A federal court restricts the Navy's use of sonar to defend America. Never mind that missiles fired from enemy submarines will harm the environment more than the sonar used to detect them.

Read More

Joel likes: Bush to whales: Drop dead

Robert Farley/Tapped

In its defense, the Navy does take some measures to prevent damage to whale populations, and its argument about the necessity of sonar training isn't absurd on its face. I suspect, however, that the whales will draw little comfort from the fact that the sonar we're killing them with is protecting their freedom.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Featured Topic | Posted 51 weeks 2 hours ago

South Carolina: How about dirty tricks?

Sunday may be a day of rest, but not for the political dirty tricksters. When Mike Huckabee emerged from the Cornerstone Family Church in Des Moines on the Sunday before the Iowa caucuses, he found that someone had papered the cars in the suburban megachurch's parking lot with fliers asking, MIKE HUCKABEE—A 'TRUE' CONSERVATIVE?

Read More

Ben likes: Harsh campaigning reflects a brutal vetting process in the Palmetto State

U.S. News & World Report

It's getting nasty down in Dixie. As the presidential balloting approaches in the key state of South Carolina, the campaigns for both parties have turned sharply negative. One reason is that the stakes are so high. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama need a victory to keep their momentum going on the Democratic side. So do John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Fred Thompson for the Republicans.

Read More

Joel likes: South Carolina AG Warns Push Pollers

TPMMuckraker

We've been tracking Common Sense Issues, the Mike Huckabee-supporting push polling group, closely. They've already made millions of calls and last night, they unleashed another onslaught on South Carolina, where they'll call a million homes over three days. All told, that means they've made approximately 7 million calls so far this election. The group's executive director told me that they're "well within the law." But one thing that hasn't been clear is whether any of the states will call the group's bluff and prosecute them.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google